Interpreting an SQL Query Plan
This chapter explains the language and terms used in an SQL query access plan generated by ShowPlan.
An SQL table is stored as a set of
maps. Each table has a master map that contains all the data in the table; the table may also have other maps such as index maps and bitmaps. Each map can be pictured as a multidimensional global, with the data for some fields in one or more
subscripts, and with the remaining fields stored in the node value. The subscripts control what data is being accessed.
For the master map, the rowid or the IDKEY fields are normally used as the map subscripts.
For an index map, normally other fields are used as the leading subscript(s), with the rowid/IDKEY fields as additional lower-level subscripts.
For a bitmap, the bitmap layer can be thought of as an additional rowid subscript level. However, bitmaps can only be used for rowids that are positive integers.
Compiling an SQL query produces a set of instructions to access and return the data specified by the query. These instructions are expressed as ObjectScript code in an .INT routine.
The instructions and the sequence in which they are executed are influenced by the data the SQL compiler has about the structure and content of the tables involved in the query. The compiler attempts to use information such as table sizes and available indices to make the set of instructions as efficient as possible.
The query access plan (ShowPlan) is a human-readable translation of that resulting set of instructions. The author of the query can use this query access plan to see how the data will be accessed. While the SQL compiler tries to make the most efficient use of data as specified by the query, sometimes the author of the query knows more about some aspect of the stored data than is evident to the compiler. In this case, the author can make use of the query plan to modify the original query to provide more information or more guidance to the query compiler.
The result of “ShowPlan” is a series of statements about what processing will be done to access and present the data specified in the original query. The following provides information on how to interpret ShowPlan statements.
The plan for a query could access several tables. When accessing a table, the plan may access a single map (index or master map), two maps (an index map followed by the master map), or, in the case of a
multi-index plan, several maps.
In accessing the data via a map, the plan indicates the subscripts used. It also indicates what the actual subscript values will be: a single given value, a set of given values, a range of values, or all values present in the table for that subscript. Which one is chosen depends on the conditions specified in the query. Obviously, accessing a single subscript value or only a few subscript values is faster than accessing all the values at that subscript level.
When the query is run, various conditions specified by the query are tested. Except for certain subscript-limiting conditions as just mentioned, The ShowPlan output does not explicitly indicate the testing of conditions. It is always best to test conditions as early as possible. The optimal place for testing the various conditions can be inferred from the plan details.
Similarly, ShowPlan does not detail the computation of expressions and sub-expressions. Besides simplicity, the main reason for this is that in most database environments, table and index access constitute the more important aspect of processing; the cost of retrieving the table data dominates the overall query cost, as disk access speed is still orders of magnitude slower than CPU processing.
When accessing data from a table, it is often necessary to examine multiple rows iteratively. Such access is indicated by a
loop. The instructions to be executed for each pass are referred to as the
bodyof the loop. They are visually indicated by being indented. It is common for database access involving multiple tables to require loops within loops. In this case, each loop level is indicated by a further indentation when compared to the previous level.
A query plan might also indicate the need to build and use an intermediate temporary file (
temp-file). This is a “scratch” area in a local array. It is used to save temporary results for various purposes, such as sorting. Just like a map, a temp-file has one or more subscripts, and possibly also node data.
Some temp-files contain data from processing a single table. In this instance, building the temp-file could be considered
pre-processingfor the data in that table. Reading such a temp-file may or may not be followed by accessing the master map of the source table. In other cases, temp-files could contain the results of processing multiple tables. In still other situations, temp-files are used to store grouped aggregate values, to check DISTINCT, etc.
The building of temp-files, as well as other processing, may be delegated to a separate unit of work called a
module. Each module is named. When separate modules are listed, the plan indicates where each module is invoked. When execution of the module finishes, processing resumes at the next statement following the module invocation.
For external tables linked through an ODBC or JDBC gateway connection, the plan shows the text of the query being sent to the remote SQL Gateway Connection to retrieve the requested data from the remote tables.
For parallel query processing, the plan shows the various queries being sent to be processed in parallel.
Some subqueries (and views) within the given query might also be processed separately. Their plans are specified in separate
subquerysections. The precise place where a subquery section is called from is not indicated in the plan. This is because they are often invoked as part of the processing of conditions or expressions.
For queries that specify OUTER JOIN, the plan may indicate the possible generation of a row of NULLs if no matching rows were found, in order to satisfy the requirements of the outer join semantics.
For UNION, the plan might indicate the combining of the result rows from the various union subqueries in a separate module, where further processing of these result rows may be done.
When analyzing the plan for a given query, application developers might sometimes feel that a different plan would be more efficient. The application developer has available a variety of ways to affect the plan.
First and foremost, plans would be affected by properly running TuneTable() in an environment that includes actual application data. Manually defining in the class source definition some of the values that TuneTable() normally computes — such as table EXTENTSIZE, field SELECTIVITY, and map BlockCount — can also be used to achieve the desired plan. Refer to Use the Tune Table Facility in the “Optimizing Tables” chapter of this manual.
In addition, analyzing the plan may indicate that certain changes to the class definition could result in plans that are more efficient, for example:
In some cases (though not always), the use of a temp-file for preprocessing can indicate that adding to the original table an index with the same or similar structure as the temp-file eliminate the need to build the temp-file. Removing this processing step from the query plan obviously could make the query run faster, but this must be balanced against the amount of work needed to maintain the index when updating the table. For further details on creating an index, refer to the Defining and Building Indices chapter of this manual.
When the plan shows an index being used, followed by access to the master map, this suggests that adding the master map fields being used in the query to the index node data might result in a faster plan for this query. Again, this must be balanced against the additional update time, as well as the extra time added to the processing of other queries that use this index, since the index would be larger and thus require somewhat more read time.
When the plan shows two tables being joined in a particular order (for example t1 being retrieved first, and then joined to t2 using the join condition t1.a=t2.b), it may be the case that the reverse table order would result in a faster plan. For example, if t2 has additional conditions that would significantly limit the number of qualifying rows. In that case, adding a t1 index on t1.a would enable such a join order to be considered. For further details on creating an index, refer to the Defining and Building Indices chapter of this manual.